Only solutions whose effectiveness has been measured in published studies are listed here, with their level of evidence and their limits. People spend most of their time indoors: that is where action can start now.
Randomised trial
Portable HEPA air cleaner
−60 %PM2.5 in the bedroom, −42% in the living area, measured over one year
Two units per home, running continuously, in homes of children with asthma.
Limits: study carried out in the United States; needs continuous electricity and replacement filters. A team is testing battery power for outages in Uganda.
Farquhar et al., Indoor Air, 2021
Real-room measurements
Do-it-yourself filter box (Corsi-Rosenthal)
×10cheaper per m³ of clean air than a commercial HEPA cleaner
A box fan and five MERV-13 filters, about $58 in parts. Measured clean air delivery: 1,000 to 1,450 m³/h, against 220 to 485 m³/h for two HEPA cleaners.
Limits: filters less fine than HEPA, noisier (58 to 67 dB), tested on particles above 0.5 µm in two empty rooms.
Dal Porto et al., Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2022
Pilot trial, incl. Rwanda
Cooking with gas (LPG) instead of wood and charcoal
−92 %PM2.5 in the kitchen, −74% personal exposure
Not an air cleaner: it removes the source. It is the most effective measure against household air pollution.
Limits: pilot trial with 40 pregnant women per country and free fuel; fuel cost determines lasting use.
HAPIN, Environmental Pollution, 2021
Train and equipsoon
Filter-box assembly workshops, air quality assessments in schools and health centres, support for local authorities and businesses.